Indicators on case law on bail on new facts You Should Know
Indicators on case law on bail on new facts You Should Know
Blog Article
These provisions utilize to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even if the transaction occurred prior to its promulgation. Read more
Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by legislation." It is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents in the boy or Woman do not approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they're able to do if they might Lower off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male who is a major, the few is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by law.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary into the determination with the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but aren't technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners might search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
As being the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been arrived at, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution outside traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a vital alternative for resolving commercial conflicts swiftly and proficiently.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it really is unclear the way it applies to any supplied situation, usually rendering judgments based over the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances in the case at hand. This kind of decisions become a guide for long run similar cases.
Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, including the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, furnishing a worthwhile resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.
Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, helping you in understanding the intricacies of land and property legislation.
Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of within the terms stated previously mentioned. However no harassment shall be caused to both party as well as the case shall be decided by the competent court of law if pending. Read more
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe as being a foster child. Even though the couple experienced two young children of their possess at home, the social worker did not inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report into the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement inside the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the pair had younger children.
We make no warranties or guarantees here about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a perfectly-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.